Guide

Sample Size for Surveys

The right survey sample size is the smallest number of completed responses that gives you enough confidence to make a decision. It depends on how precise you need to be (margin of error), how confident you want to be (confidence level), and whether your population is finite.

By Jordan Keane • Research Ops Writer • Published Jan 15, 2026

Quick answers (common scenarios)

These are the most common choices in business surveys. If you’re unsure, start with the simplest: 95% confidence and ±5% margin of error.

Confidence level Margin of error Typical required responses* When to use
90% ±10% ~68 Very directional feedback; early discovery.
95% ±10% ~97 Quick pulse checks; lightweight reporting.
95% ±5% ~385 Standard “confidence + precision” baseline.
99% ±5% ~664 High-stakes reporting; larger buffers needed.

*These are conservative ballpark estimates for large populations using p = 0.5 (the most conservative case). If you know the expected proportion, required sample can be smaller.

If you only remember one thing

Precision costs responses. Cutting margin of error from ±10% to ±5% generally increases required responses by about 4×.

The formulas (plain English)

Most business surveys estimate a proportion (e.g., % satisfied, % who recommend, % who experienced an issue), so the “proportion” sample size formula is the most common.

1) Margin of error for a proportion

The margin of error gets smaller when you increase sample size, but it shrinks at a diminishing rate (square root relationship).

E = z × √( p × (1 − p) ÷ n )
  • E = margin of error (as a decimal; 0.05 means ±5%).
  • z = z-score for your confidence level (95% → 1.96).
  • p = expected proportion (use 0.5 if unknown for conservative sizing).
  • n = completed responses needed (sample size).

2) Solve for sample size (n)

Rearranging the formula gives the common sample size equation for proportions:

n = (z² × p × (1 − p)) ÷ E²
Conservative: p = 0.5 → n = (z² × 0.25) ÷ E²

Example: 95% confidence (z = 1.96), ±5% margin (E = 0.05) → n ≈ 384.16, so round up to 385.

3) Finite population correction (FPC)

If your population is small and you are sampling a meaningful fraction of it, you can reduce required sample size with a finite population adjustment.

n_adj = n ÷ ( 1 + (n − 1) ÷ N )
Where N = population size

Practical tip: FPC tends to matter when your sample would be around 10% or more of the population. If you’re sampling 1–2% of a big customer base, it usually changes very little.

Sample size vs invites (don’t get burned)

The most common planning mistake is stopping at “we need 385 responses” and forgetting that response rate might be 10–20%.

Invites formula

Invites needed = Target responses ÷ Expected response rate

Example: If you need 385 responses and expect 15% response rate, invite about 2,567 people (385 ÷ 0.15).

How to choose expected response rate

  • Use your historical baseline if you have it (best option).
  • If you don’t, start conservative (e.g., 10–20% for many email customer surveys).
  • Assume lower response if your list is cold, your survey is long, or the topic is low relevance.

Practical notes (real-world survey planning)

Statistics helps with precision, but real surveys fail in predictable ways: low response rate, biased samples, and uneven segment coverage.

1) Segment coverage matters more than total

If you want to compare regions, product tiers, or customer cohorts, you need enough completed responses in each segment to make a decision.

2) Beware non-response bias

A survey with 15% response rate can still be useful — but only if respondents are reasonably representative. If only your happiest (or angriest) customers respond, results skew.

Fix: sample across the customer base, avoid over-surveying power users, and include multiple channels if needed.

3) For directional decisions, smaller samples can be enough

If you’re just trying to find the top 3 pain points, you often don’t need 385 responses — you need clear patterns.

Fix: pair a smaller survey with qualitative follow-up (interviews) or open-text analysis.